Report of Nominations for Grand Lodge Officers


IAM members in more than 800 local lodges in the United States and Canada have concluded nominations and runoff votes where necessary to determine lodge endorsements for the IAM Executive Council positions of International President, General Secretary-Treasurer and, for U.S. locals, eight General Vice Presidents.

Click here for a complete tabulation of local lodge endorsements.

As a result of the local lodge endorsements and in accordance with the IAM Constitution, the election of Grand Lodge officers will be conducted at local lodge meetings in the month of April, 2014.

The members chosen as nominees under the endorsement process are as follows (nominees are listed in order of the number of endorsements received):

For International President

R. Thomas Buffenbarger, Local Lodge 912 Jay Cronk, Local Lodge 1112

For General Secretary-Treasurer

Robert Roach, Jr., Local Lodge 1445 Dale Cancienne, Local Lodge 1905

For 8 General Vice Presidents

Mark Blondin, Local Lodge 751C Gary R. Allen, Local Lodge 794 Lynn D. Tucker, Jr., Local Lodge 2312 Robert Martinez, Jr., Local Lodge 776A Dora Cervantes, Local Lodge 2198 Sito Pantoja, Local Lodge 949 Philip J. Gruber, Local Lodge 688 Diane Babineaux, Grand Lodge Patrick E. Maloney, Local Lodge 63 Karen Asuncion, Local Lodge 1759 Tim O’Brien, Local Lodge 851 Jason Redrup, Local Lodge 751A Sande Lien, Local Lodge 2202

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Change in Worker’s Compensation To Include Bullying

 Bill 14, the Workers’ Compensation Amendment Act, 2011, which became law on May 31, 2012, addresses bullying and harassment.  Starting in July, Work Safe claims for mental stress resulting from traumatic events in the workplace, a significant work-related stress or a cumulative series of significant work-related stress will be considered.

Work Safe Policy will put some limits on the stress claims. Stress must exceed the normal pressures in the workplace and involve threatening or abusive behaviour such as bullying or harassment.

Dealing with work place bullies takes some preparation. A single incident of abuse does not constitute enough to make a grievance of Work Safe claim stick. We need to document a pattern of abuse over a period of time. The Union recommends keeping a pocket notebook and every time there is an incident record the time, date, people involved, both directly and as witnesses and a brief description of the event. Once series of incidents are documented any grievance or claim will stand on its own merits.

What are examples of bullying?

While bullying is a form of aggression, the actions can be both obvious and subtle. It is important to note that the following is not a checklist, nor does it mention all forms of bullying. This list is included as a way of showing some of the ways bullying may happen in a workplace. Also remember that bullying is usually considered to be a pattern of behaviour where one or more incidents will help show that bullying is taking place.

Examples include:

  • spreading malicious rumours, gossip, or innuendo that is not true
  • excluding or isolating someone socially
  • intimidating a person
  • undermining or deliberately impeding a person’s work
  • physically abusing or threatening abuse
  • removing areas of responsibilities without cause
  • constantly changing work guidelines
  • establishing impossible deadlines that will set up the individual to fail
  • withholding necessary information or purposefully giving the wrong information
  • making jokes that are ‘obviously offensive’ by spoken word or e-mail
  • intruding on a person’s privacy by pestering, spying or stalking
  • assigning unreasonable duties or workload which are unfavourable to one person (in a way that creates unnecessary pressure)
  • underwork – creating a feeling of uselessness
  • yelling or using profanity
  • criticising a person persistently or constantly
  • belittling a person’s opinions
  • unwarranted (or undeserved) punishment
  • blocking applications for training, leave or promotion
  • tampering with a person’s personal belongings or work equipment.

It is sometimes hard to know if bullying is happening at the workplace. Many studies acknowledge that there is a “fine line” between strong management and bullying. Comments that are objective and are intended to provide constructive feedback are not usually considered bullying, but rather are intended to assist the employee with their work.

If you are not sure an action or statement could be considered bullying, you can use the “reasonable person” test. Would most people consider the action unacceptable?

If you are facing a bully at work, talk to your Shop Steward
and form a plan to document the behavior.
With some diligent note taking, bullying can be addressed.


Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Canada Wide Day of Action Over University Tuition


The Canadian Federation of Students is calling for union members and activists of all ages to join them for their February 1st Day of Action.

There are rallies, sit-ins, teach-ins and events going on in cities around British Columbia.

To find out more about the day of action or to sign up for events in your area visit or email


Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Jim Sinclair Says Vote YES to Scrap the HST

I’m Jim Sinclair, President of the B.C. Federation of Labour. HST ballots have started arriving, and I wanted to send a personal message to working people and their families that we need to stand together and vote YES to SCRAP the HST.

Today, we released a simple and clear video: Stickman Explains the HST Honestly

I encourage you to watch the video and share it as widely as possible.

Share the video on Facebook

Share the video on Youtube

Email the video to your friends

 From day one, the BC Liberal government has lied about everything about this regressive tax shift. Since becoming Premier, Ms. Clark has spent millions of public dollars on a partisan advertising campaign that repeats BC Liberal lies about the HST. I’m tired of her lies and very concerned about the future of our province for working families. We need to vote YES to scrap the HST.

• We need to vote YES so that essential items like childrens’ clothing, safety products, veterinary bills, and home repairs don’t have hundreds of dollars of new taxes – more than $1,000 a year in new taxes for an average family.

• We need to vote YES so that big corporations don’t walk away with an extra $2 billion every year, at your expense.

• We need to vote YES so that our public services like health care and education aren’t left with a $1 billion shortfall.

• We need to vote YES so our elected representatives learn that they can’t lie to voters and get away with it.

Between now and July 22, we have a very important job to do. Today, I am asking you to do a few simple things to ensure we succeed.

1. Visit and sign the Yes to Scrap the HST Pledge

2. Share this email with your colleagues and friends, and encourage them to visit for the real facts about the HST.

3. Organize a “bring your ballot to work day”.

Let’s work together and defeat this regressive tax shift. Let’s vote YES to scrap the HST.

Jim Sinclair,
BC Federation of Labour

 p.s. Our parody ad campaign, taking on the stick men, has everyone talking. You can see the videos at

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

The HST Has Been a Con Job Since Day 1

By Jim Sinclair, President of the BC Federation of labour
Special to The Province July 7, 2011 ~ Link to Province story

British Columbians are now voting on whether or not to scrap the HST.

If the HST survives the referendum, it will go down as one of the most successful con jobs in the history of the province.

A good con starts with a lie. The B.C. Liberals said point blank they would not bring in the HST. Then they got re-elected and immediately imposed the HST, assuming the con would work. After all, it was four years until the next election.

This particular con job involved British Columbians overlooking the fact that they would be picking up a $2-billion tax bill on just about everything that would let big business avoid paying $2 billion in taxes every year.

The plan was simple enough.

Like most con jobs, people were skeptical. Polls showed 80 per cent weren’t buying it. Even the popular former finance minister Carole Taylor saw the con for what it was and rejected it. “This particular tax takes the tax off of businesses — it takes $1.8 billion off of businesses — and puts it on consumers,” she said.

British Columbians turned their anger to action, creating a grassroots movement that did the impossible, forcing the first citizen referendum in B.C.

Clearly this con job was in serious trouble and a new strategy was needed.

Job one: change the con artist. Gordon Campbell, facing political oblivion, was run out of office and we all felt a little better.

Business lined up behind pro-HST leadership hopeful Kevin Falcon and all appeared on course until Christy Clark rocked the boat and won the leadership. It was almost the end of the HST.

Clark knew the tax was a dog and said so: “After almost a year, the public still hates the HST . . . and if it goes to a referendum, a real referendum, the HST will almost certainly fail.”

Her suggestion to kill it was simple enough. Do what the people wanted, vote down the HST in the legislature and save millions by cancelling the referendum.

She ruled out lowering the tax. “We aren’t going to be talking about trying to reduce it by a point or two before the referendum. I think people will see that as buying them with their own money,” Clark said in March. “We’re going to have a $1.6-billion bigger deficit or we’re going to have fewer heart operations, special-needs teachers, school facilities [and] hospital emergency rooms.”

British Columbians hoping Clark would bring real change had their hopes dashed when, bowing to business and cabinet pressure, Clark did a complete U-turn on the HST.

The HST would go to referendum, only sooner, and she did what she said she would not do — she lowered the HST to 10 per cent from 12.

The con job was on again. This time, business was ready.

More than 40 business groups under the umbrella of “smart taxes” are spending millions to tell us the HST is a great thing, lots of jobs, lower taxes, lower prices and prosperity for all. None of it is true.

The Clark Liberals piled on with another $5 million of taxpayer money to back up the business message. It is, by all accounts, a shameful turn of events.

Here’s what the con artists won’t tell you. Ordinary British Columbians will see taxes go up. A paltry 200 jobs a month might be created at cost of nearly $1 million per job.

Prices have not gone down, and the provincial budget will now be more than $1 billion short and government will have to cut jobs and services. As for the $2-billion tax cut for business, they get to keep it all.

British Columbians want fair taxes, they want good jobs and they want a province where health care, education and other important public services are funded. Let’s reject this cynical attempt to con us again and vote YES to scrap the HST and start a real conversation about creating good jobs, sharing tax responsibilities fairly and building a province of prosperity and opportunity for everyone.

Now that’s a job working people are up for, not another con job.


Jim Sinclair is president of the B.C. Federation of Labour.

© Copyright (c) The Province

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter